Louisville Metro: Local Statistics on Religion

As we think about Family Mission Nights coming up this summer, take a look at the numbers in our own backyard that show decline in many areas, and a startling increase in Muslim followers and still a huge number of folks not affiliated with any faith.

Fully one-half of the population of the Louisville area is unclaimed by any religious organization as an adherent.

Baptists and Catholics continue to dominate the Kentuckiana religious scene among those who are adherents, despite membership losses. The network of Christian Churches and Churches of Christ — with Southeast Christian in the flagship — is growing fast. Mormons are a small but fast-growing group, as are Muslims.

Non-denominational churches also form a large part of the local religious scene, but because they are only newly being studied, there’s no way to compare them to previous decades.

Those are among the findings of a once-a-decade private census of American religious bodies that I wrote about in my story here, which also finds an overall decline in religious denominational affiliation since 2000 regionally and nationally, as best as groups could be compared from one decade to another.

This doesn’t mean the researchers counted everyone. But they beat the bushes to try to find as many adherents as they could, particularly off the denominational beaten path — having some success in documenting non-denominational churches, non-traditional religions and historically black churches where records are not as readily available.

But the 636,073 unclaimed group are by far larger than any denomination in the Louisville Metropolitan Statistical Area, which includes Jefferson and 12 surrounding counties in Kentucky and Southern Indiana. Even if one compares apples to oranges — everyone counted this time versus the smaller number of denominations counted in 2000 — a 4 percent increase in adherents doesn’t keep pace with a 10 percent increase in overall population.

The U.S. Religion Census data can be found here. The survey was done by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies.

So what explains the other 50 percent, especially since many religious groups often like to stretch the definition of “adherent” as broadly as possible? We know from other studies that about a third of Kentuckians are “unchurched,” lacking meaningful connection to a congregation. A few religions, such as Jehovah’s Witnesses, didn’t participate, and researchers said the African-American church count was likely incomplete.

Here are the listings for the statistical area, which includes Jefferson, Bullitt, Henry, Meade, Nelson, Oldham, Shelby, Spencer and Trimble counties in Kentucky and Clark, Floyd, Harrison and Washington counties in Indiana. Some of the columns line up better than others, but they should be readable:

RELIGIOUS BODIES  LOUISVILLE MSA 2010 ADHERENTS  CHANGE FROM 2000 PERCENT CHANGE FROM 2000
Southern Baptist            189,547               (1,500) -1%
Roman Catholic            175,432            (47,857) -21%
Christian Churches and Churches of Christ              63,515               39,459 164%
United Methodist              42,288               (3,823) -8%
Non-denominational              22,376  NA NA
Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)              17,104               (3,087) -15%
National Baptist Conv USA              15,092  NA NA
Progressive Nat’l Baptist              14,799  NA NA
Churches of Christ              11,630                  (383) -3%
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)              10,818               (3,690) -25%
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints                 9,880                 4,575 86%
Episcopal Church                 7,303                  (183) -2%
American Baptist Churches in the USA                 6,716                  (341) -5%
Muslim Estimate                 6,648                 3,996 151%
Church of God (Cleveland, Tenn.)                 5,776                    689 14%
Assemblies of God                 4,574               (7,438) -62%
Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod                 4,481                  (582) -12%
United Church of Christ                 3,757  NA NA
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America                 3,374               (1,107) -25%
Church of the Nazarene                 3,262                  (459) -12%
Seventh-day Adventist                 3,136                    550 21%
Reform Judaism                 2,678  NA NA
African Methodist Episcopal                 2,636  NA NA
National Baptist Convention of America                 2,417  NA NA
Buddhist                 2,218  NA NA
Conservative Judaism                 2,071  NA NA
African Methodist Episcopal Zion                 1,849  NA NA
Church of God of Prophecy                 1,150                    233 25
Salvation Army                 1,091                  (192) -15%
Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese                    950  NA NA
Christian Methodist Episcopal                    915  NA NA
Church of God (Anderson, Ind.)                    877                  (435) -33%
Unitarian Universalist Assn                    613  NA NA
Community of Christ                    515  NA NA
Amish                    460  NA NA
Orthodox Judaism                    450  NA NA
National Missionary Baptist                    439  NA NA
Christian and Missionary Alliance                    430                    151 54%
Evangelical Free Church of America                    405                    240 146%
Wesleyan Church                    404                  (610) -60%
Church of God in Christ                    336  NA NA
Bahá’í                    328  NA NA
Vineyard USA                    286                    156 120%
Hindu                    278  NA NA
Cumberland Presbyterian                    276                  (236) -46%
Presbyterian Church in America                    276                    160 138%
Greek Orthodox                    230  NA NA
Foursquare Gospel, Int’l Church of                    193  NA NA
Int’l Churches of Christ                    183                  (239) -57%
Church of God in Christ, Mennonite                    154                       89 137%
Metropolitan Community Churches                    132  NA NA
Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod                    131                       14 12%
Free Will Baptists                    117                  (349) -75%
Friends General Conference                       99  NA NA
Int’l Pentecostal Holiness                       93  NA NA
Converge Worldwide/Baptist Gen’l Conf                       90  NA NA
Friends United Meeting                       74  NA NA
Associate Reformed Presbyterian                       43                    (29) -40%
Allegheny Wesleyan Methodist                       28                       16 133%
Free Methodist Church                       28                    (18) -39%
Seventh Day Baptist                       27  NA NA
Zoroastrian                       15  NA NA
TOTAL POPULATION        1,283,566            121,591 10%
TOTAL ADHERENTS*            647,493               28,076 4%*
ADHERENTS COUNTED IN 2000 AND 2010*            569,646            (22,296) -4%
UNCLAIMED            636,073               93,515 15%
* While the overall adherent count rose, that includes many groups not counted in 2000. There was a net loss in adherents among groups that could be compared directly from 2000 to 2010.

Defining the “Mission of the Church”

Defining the “Mission of the Church”   (from the highly recommended free pub, Credo magazine)

This month’s issue of Credo magazine is about missions and the church. I was asked to contribute a definition of “the mission of the church” for inclusion in the magazine. It took me a while to think about how to form a definition that showed the relationship between the church’s identity and mission. In the end, this is the definition I offered:

The church is a sign and instrument of the kingdom of God, a people united by faith in the gospel announcement of the crucified and risen King Jesus. The mission of the church is to go into the world in the power of the Spirit and make disciples by proclaiming this gospel, calling people to respond in ongoing repentance and faith, and demonstrating the truth and power of the gospel by living under the lordship of Christ for the glory of God and the good of the world.

Credo included two other responses. The first was from Andrew Farley, who approached his definition from a personal angle:

The mission of the church is to know Jesus Christ and to bear the fruit of His Spirit. We only truly love in the “agape” way when we first grasp how He demonstrated His love for us – by forgiving us all our sins; by freeing us from the impossible standard of the Law; and by giving us a brand new identity in Him. Once we see the glory of the new covenant promises to us, we can transmit His love to the world around us.

My friend Jonathan Leeman also contributed a definition. His focused on the local church aspect of the mission:

Broadly, God has given His new covenant people on Planet Earth the glorious tasks of proclaiming the God-man Jesus – His substitutionary sacrifice and resurrected Lordship – and of living as a distinct society of Spirit-filled citizens who, little by little, are learning to embody Jesus’ own love, mercy, and justice toward one another first and the nations second, all for the sake of displaying the matchless glory of the Father. For the purpose of fulfilling these great tasks and ends, Jesus has authorized regular gatherings of two or more new covenant members to constitute themselves as official outposts of the kingdom, or local churches, or exercising the keys of the kingdom through preaching the gospel, binding and loosing those who confess with baptism and the Lord’s Supper, teaching everything that Christ has commanded, and spurring one another on to the aforementioned love and good deeds.

Here are some other definitions of the church’s mission:

Ed Stetzer and the Missional Manifesto:

The mission and responsibility of the church includes both the proclamation of the Gospel and its demonstration. From Jesus, we learn the truth is to be proclaimed with authority and lived with grace. The church must constantly evangelize, respond lovingly to human needs, as well as “seek the welfare of the city” (Jeremiah 29:7). By living out the implications of the gospel, the missional church offers a verbal defense and a living example of its power.

Kevin DeYoung and Greg Gilbert:

The mission of the church is to go into the world and make disciples by declaring the gospel of Jesus Christ in the power of the Spirit and gathering these disciples into churches, that they might worship and obey Jesus Christ now and in eternity to the glory of God the Father.

The nuances and differences in these definitions can be attributed to various issues related to how the question is heard:

  • Are we speaking of the local church as an institution or the church as individuals scattered throughout society?
  • How are we defining terms like “teaching” and “gathering” and “sending”?
  • Is it important to define what the church is before defining what the church does? And is it possible to define the church apart from God’s mission?
  • How do we define terms like “nations” and “disciples”?

In thinking through these and other issues, I’m inclined to see the identity of the church – God’s called-out, “sent,” kingdom people – as an illuminating framework for wrestling with the other related issues of evangelism, mentoring, disciple-making, mercy ministry, etc. In the end, the “mission of the church” is part of an ongoing discussion that I hope will encourage us as the people of God to embrace our missionary identity.

How would you define the mission of the church?

Making Church Attendance a Priority

We shall all do well to remember the charge: “Forsake not the assembling of yourselves together, as the manner of some is.” (Heb. 10:25). Never to be absent from God’s house on Sundays, without good reason – never to miss the Lord’s Supper when administered in our own congregation – never to let our place be empty when means of grace are going on, this is one way to be a growing and prosperous Christian. The very sermon that we needlessly miss, may contain a precious word in season for our souls. The very assembly for prayer and praise from which we stay away, may be the very gathering that would have cheered, established, and revived our hearts. We little know how dependent our spiritual health is on little, regular, habitual helps, and how much we suffer if we miss our medicine.

~ J.C. Ryle

Please check out the outstanding site where this quote came from clicking on the J.C. Ryle name above!

Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: John, volume 3, [Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth, 1987], 454-455. {John 20:24-31}

Radical Obedience: A Conversation with David Platt

By Trevin Wax on Aug 10, 2011 in Book Reviews, Interviews, Missions / Evangelism                                               

Today, I’m happy to be joined by David Platt, pastor of The Church at Brook Hills in Birmingham, AL, for a conversation about his latest book, Radical Together: Unleashing the People of God for the Purpose of God. I appreciated Radical Together for its emphasis on the church as the agent through which God extends His glory to the nations. As I read David’s book, I marked up the margins with questions that remained unresolved in my mind.

Today, David graciously responds to some of my lingering questions about his bold proposal. I pray our conversation will edify and embolden you as you seek to fulfill the Great Commission.

Trevin Wax: David, in Radical Together, you write:

“If you and I want our lives to count for God’s purpose in the world, we need to begin with a commitment to God’s people in the church.”

Why is it so vital that the church be at the forefront of our efforts to fulfill the Great Commission?

David Platt: The local church is God’s chosen, called, and ordained agent for the accomplishment of the Great Commission. From the beginning of the book of Acts, we see God’s people, by God’s design, coming together in local churches that are devoted to God’s Word, to fellowship with one another, to worship, and to prayer (Acts 2:42). Through these local churches, the Lord began adding to their number daily those who were being saved (Acts 2:47). Out of 114 times that we ekklesia in the New Testament, at least 90 of them refer to specific local gatherings of believers.

Clearly, the New Testament precedent and pattern is the advancement of the gospel through followers of Christ who are joined together in local bodies. As a result, if we want to be a part of spreading the gospel to all peoples in global mission, biblically we need to begin with a commitment to God’s people in the local church.

Trevin Wax: In your chapter on “The Misunderstood Gospel,” you make some clarifications regarding the motivation for our obedience. You write:

Unleashing radical people into the world requires the gospel as our foundation and our motivation.

David Platt: That’s right. I don’t want any follower of Christ to be overwhelmed by guilt, constantly wondering:

“When I am going to be radical enough?”
“What do I need to do, how do I need to give, or where do I need to go in order to do enough for God?”
These are extremely unhealthy questions, for the reality with which the gospel confronts us is that we’ll never be able to do enough. No matter what we do, even if we sell all of our possessions, give to the poor, and move to the most dangerous country in the world, we cannot do enough to be accepted before God or approved by God.

The beauty of the gospel is that Christ alone is able to do enough. He alone is able to keep the law and commands of God, and He has done it. Indeed, He has been faithful enough, generous enough, compassionate enough, etc. As a result, the starting point of the radical life is death to self, death to every attempt to do enough before God, and trust in Christ, the One who has lived the radical life on our behalf.

Trevin Wax: How does this beauty of the gospel translate into the beauty of Christian obedience?

David Platt: The beauty now is that when we trust in Christ to be our righteousness, we are now free to obey from a totally different position. In Christ, we have been declared “not guilty” before God. As a result, we no longer live from a position of guilt, but from a position of righteousness. And not only have we been declared righteous in Christ (as if this were not enough!), but He has given us His Spirit, and He lives in us to enable us at every single moment to live according to the commands which He has given us. As Christians, we now find ourselves free from guilt and driven by grace.

Trevin Wax: Why is it important that grace, not guilt be what motivates us?

David Platt: In addition to everything I’ve mentioned above, guilt is ultimately an unbearable burden and an unsustainable motivator. We may change our ways for a short time based on guilt, but real, true, radical life change will not happen until we trust in the gospel.

So my encouragement in Radical Together to anyone who struggles with a low-grade sense of guilt, wondering if they are ever doing enough, would be to realize that they can never do enough…and then to rejoice in the reality that Christ has done enough for them. Then, whenever they are confronted with sin or shortcomings, I would encourage them to trust in Christ, to rest in His righteousness, and to ask Him to produce the fruit of a radical gospel in their lives. This alone will sustain radical, life-changing, world-impacting obedience for the glory of God in all nations.

Trevin Wax: You express concern about the “missional” movement, if by missional we mean merely focusing on our immediate context and not on reaching the unreached with the gospel. I think “missional” is a reaction against the older idea that “missions” is something that we pay other people (“missionaries”) to do over there. The missional movement is seeking to remind us that we are all missionaries in our local context. It seems that you see a distinction between missional churches and Great Commission churches. Is that so? Why or why not?

David Platt: “Missional” is quite a loaded, and often misunderstood, word in many conversations today. I certainly appreciate any effort to remind us that God intends us all to make disciples wherever we live, particularly in our local context. This is the command of God for each of us to follow, and so by God’s grace we need to wake up every day intentionally considering how we can most effectively make disciples where we work, where we play, and where we live.

At the same time, the Great Commission is not just a command from Jesus to make disciples; it’s a command from Jesus to make disciples of all nations (literally, panta ta ethne, of all the people groups). This means that Jesus has commanded us to go beyond just the place where we live and the people we live among. He has commanded us to go to people groups all around the world who have little to no access to the gospel. This is at the heart of the Great Commission.

So being “missional,” in the sense of the whole of the Great Commission, is never just about making disciples among people right around us. Being “missional” according to the Great Commission involves making disciples among people far away from us (geographically and/or ethnically).

As a result, in Radical Together, I want to encourage those who would claim the banner of “missional” to be truly “missional.” Let’s continue to focus on making disciples among the people around us (let’s not detract from that focus!), and let’s focus on making disciples among peoples all around the world who presently have no access to the gospel. This is obedience to the Great Commission and the heart of what it means to be “missional.”

Trevin Wax: Is it possible to so focus on the unreached people groups that we discount the good work being done by people in other parts of the world? I had this question about myself as I was reading the book. Were my five years in Romania not really Great-Commission work, since that country is partially evangelized?

David Platt: For what it’s worth, I think your work in Romania (assuming you were making disciples there with a view toward seeing all nations reached with the gospel) was absolutely Great Commission work. For that matter, I trust that my work in Birmingham, AL (talk about reached!), is also Great Commission work as I shepherd a church to make disciples here with a view toward penetrating every people group on the planet with the gospel.

We are constantly tempted to choose between either going to reached peoples or going to unreached peoples. But this need not be an “either/or” scenario. What if God has designed our work among reached peoples to be aimed toward the spread of the gospel among unreached peoples?

The example I use in Radical Together involves how we as a church are focusing on ministry to various people in Birmingham (Brook Hills Bob) with a view toward the spread of the gospel among all peoples in the world (Brook Hills Baruti). We don’t want Birmingham or the nations for Christ; we want Birmingham and the nations for Christ.

So is it possible to so focus on unreached peopled groups that we discount the good work being done by people in other parts of the world? I suppose. But not if we understand disciple-making as a “both/and” scenario instead of an “either/or scenario.” Jesus made disciples among a very small group of Jewish men in the first century in a way that has led to you and I becoming disciples in America in the twenty-first century. Let’s follow His lead and make disciples among reached places in a way that will lead to disciples being made in unreached places all around the world.

Trevin Wax: What is the value of short-term missions in fulfilling the Great Commission?

David Platt: There are so many abuses when it comes to short-term mission trips, and oftentimes these abuses obscure the tremendous value of short-term missions. The goal of short-term mission is always long-term impact…on a variety of different levels.

First, we want to be a part of long-term impact in other contexts in the world. Obviously, we are not going to be able to go into another setting and make disciples in a week or two. So our goal should always be to connect relationally with long-term disciple-making processes in other contexts. Whether it is missionaries who have moved into another country/context, or nationals living in another context/country, we want to connect with brothers and sisters who are carrying out long-term disciple-making in that country/context. They know what the best uses might be for a short-term mission team, and there is great confidence in going to a place and serving alongside brothers and sisters like this, knowing that you are a part of supporting a long-term disciple-making process in that country/context for the glory of Christ.

But the long-term impact is not just about what happens in that country/context during that week or two on a short-term mission trip. We also want to promote a long-term impact in the people who are going on that short-term mission trip. This is a part of the disciple-making process in our own churches. In the church I pastor, short-term mission trips are a huge component of our long-term disciple-making processes. We want people that we are teaching and training in Christ to go into other contexts in the world, to see the glory of God in ways they may have never seen before, and to expand their understanding of the global purpose for which God has created them.

So for anyone that is looking to go on a short-term mission trip, the goal is not just to focus on impacting another part of the world; the goal is to focus on impacting the people you take with you to another part of the world, so that when you come back to your own context, you and the people who traveled with you are that much more committed to obeying the Great Commission in the context of where you live every day. In addition, many people will come back from a short-term mission trip and decide to go into more mid-term or long-term missions. Almost all of the people who have gone out from our church to serve in another country/context for 6 months, a year or two, or a lifetime, started by going on a short-term mission trip.

In all of these ways, short-term mission trips can be hugely valuable for supporting disciple-making processes in other parts of the world as well as right where we live. Through short-term, mid-term, and long-term missions, we join together with our brothers and sisters around the world as we work with all our hearts to take the gospel to the ends of the earth.

Trevin Wax: How does God-centered preaching lead to passion for evangelism?

David Platt: The gospel begins and ends with God. He is the holy, just, and gracious Creator of the universe who has sent His Son, God in the flesh, to bear His wrath against sin on the cross and to show His power over sin in the resurrection so that everyone who believes in Christ will be reconciled to God forever. And this is the gospel that we proclaim in evangelism.

So how do we best lead and shepherd God’s people to evangelize? By giving them a grand understanding of God. In preaching, we unfold the character of God: His holiness, His justice, His grace, and all of His other breath-taking attributes. As we magnify His Word, people behold His glory. And they believe, deep within their minds and their hearts, that God is great and greatly to be praised. In the process, this becomes the ultimate motivation for evangelism. The more the people I pastor see God’s worth, the more they want to make His worth known in the world.

So week after week after week, as I stand before them with God’s Word, I want to show them God’s worth. As they hear His Word and they see His worth, they will lay down their lives to make the good news of God’s grace and glory known to the people around them and people groups around the world. God-centered, gospel-saturated preaching is great fuel for Christ-honoring, world-embracing evangelism.
Radical Obedience: A Conversation with David Platt.